What MCAT Score Do You Need to Get into Medical School

You’ve spent months in an MCAT review course, taken practice test after practice test, and finally sat for the exam. Your results are in. Are they good enough to get you into your target medical school? Let’s take a look at what your scores mean. The Difference between the MCAT and Your Grades The primary purpose of the MCAT is to assess an applicant’s ability to succeed in medical school by testing critical skills and knowledge of natural, physical, and behavioral sciences. The MCAT score is the only piece of the med school application that is standardized. Your grades are anything but standardized. Applicants to medical schools attended different schools, took courses of different levels and from different professors who used different grading standards. Therefore, even your GPA, which is generally looked at as an â€Å"objective† piece of the application, is actually subjective. Each of the four sections of the MCAT is scored between 118 and 132. AAMC originally designed the test aiming for an average section score of 125 and an average total score of 500 within a total score range from 472 to 528. For better or worse, the average score of all applicants and matriculants is rising. In 2016-17 the total average score was 501.8. The following year, 2017-18 it had climbed to 504.7. How to Evaluate the Competitiveness of Your MCAT Score So, what is the magic number needed to get into medical school? Unfortunately, there is no single answer to this question for all med schools, or even for all med school applicants. Here are some factors to examine when evaluating the competitiveness of your MCAT score: †¢ What are the average MCAT scores for the schools you are applying to? Students admitted to MD programs in the US in 2017 had average total MCAT scores between 508 and 509. According to AACOM (American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine), those admitted to DO programs in 2016 (the most recent data available) had average total MCAT scores of 502.17. Those figures give you a broad overview, but it’s the specific schools’ data that should really guide your application strategy. For example, your very respectable score of 504 may be competitive at Northeast Ohio, an MD program where the average MCAT score for admitted students was 505, with a 10th-90th percentile range of 501-512. However, if your dream school is Washington University in St. Louis, you probably need to up your score†¦or change your dream. The average MCAT score for admitted students at Wash U was 521, with a range of 10th-90th percentile range of 516-525 per MSAR. †¢ Is your score balanced? What does it mean if your scores were 130 on three sections of the MCAT and 115 on the fourth? Clearly you have a weakness in an area that most medical schools feel is important enough to test and measure. Although your total score was a respectable 505, med schools will still look at the imbalance in your scores and be concerned in particular about the one area that was so much weaker. †¢ How competitive is your GPA? If your GPA is at the high end for the schools you are applying to, the admissions committees may cut you a little slack on your MCAT score. The average undergrad GPA for those admitted to an MD program in 2017 was 3.70. AACOM’s reported 2016 overall mean baccalaureate GPA for matriculants was 3.45. †¢ How is the rest of your application? The MCAT is not evaluated in a vacuum, and even a great MCAT score will not be enough to guarantee your med school acceptance. The rest of your application must show the admissions committee that you are serious about medical school and a medical career, have the character to be a compassionate doctor, and have the background and interpersonal skills to contribute to your community. Even if you have all of these attributes, you have to present them effectively via your primary and secondary applications and your interview. Be sure your application is complete and neat. Your essays must be compelling and tell the story of an applicant the adcoms will want to get to know better. Which Schools Should You Apply To? When choosing which med schools to apply to, look at their average MCAT scores and the range of MCAT scores for matriculants at your target schools. Be sure that your score is in range for all, or for the overwhelming majority of, your target schools. Unless you have a high GPA, other truly impressive elements in your application, or come from an underrepresented background in medicine, make sure that your MCAT is above average for at least some of the programs you are applying to. Remember that the purpose of the MCAT is to show your readiness to handle the academics of medical school. It is a very important element of your med school application, but it’s not the only one. Commitment, character, interpersonal skills, and your potential to contribute to your community are important as well. Be sure that your total application shows that you not only can handle the academics, but that you will be an outstanding physician and credit to the med school you attend. Do you have questions about how you’ll measure up compared to other medical school applicants? Do you need help creating a strong application that will get you noticedand then accepted? Check out Accepted’s Medical School Admissions Consulting Services for expert assistance in the admissions process. ; For 25 years, Accepted has helped applicants gain acceptance to their dream healthcare programs. Our outstanding team of admissions consultants features former admissions directors, admissions committee members, pre-health advisors, postbac program directors, and doctors. Our staff has guided applicants to acceptance at allopathic (MD) and osteopathic (DO) medical schools, residencies and fellowships, dental school, veterinarian school, and physician assistant programs at top schools such as Harvard, Stanford, Penn, UCSF, Johns Hopkins, Columbia, and many more.  Want an admissions expert  to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢ The MCAT: Craft Your Strategy for Success, a free webinar †¢ Tips for Applicants With a Low MCAT Score (Part 1) †¢Ã‚  How Does the Med School Adcom View Multiple MCAT Scores?

Cubist artists Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque Essay - 1100 Words

Cubist artists Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque Essay (Essay Sample) Content: Name:Course:Instructor:Date:For the Cubist artists Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, Jokes, Puns and Visual games played an important role in their development of a groundbreaking new artistic style. DiscussArtists do not just come up with abstract ideas and productions. At some point in life each and every artist draws inspiration from certain aspects of nature that inspires them to come up the various artistic creations. Pablo Picasso and George Braque are regarded the fathers of analytic cubism, an artistic painting style that is primarily characterized by extensive use of geometric shapes and tendencies by the artists to lean towards monochromatic use of color. Analytic cubism is therefore thought of as an improvement of the general cubic art, an influential art movement that begun in the 20th century. An insightful journey into the genesis of analytic cubism reveals that the two great artists, artists Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, draw their inspiration from day to day jokes, Puns and Visual games as to come up with most influential form of cubic art.Analytic cubism was regarded as an avant-garde art movement that brought a revolution in painting art and whose effects went on t o change the faces of European painting, contemporary architecture, music and even to some extent, literature. When Pablo and Braque were establishing the foundations of analytic cubism in France in 1910 1920 to set the style off as an official form of painting, almost all countries in Europe had picked up the style to inspire offshoots similar to he styles of Futurism and constructivism. While subjects and objects in cubism were broken down into cubes to resemble their abstract form, analytic cubism introduced the element of not only cubes but geometric shapes and lines.The oxford dictionary of contemporary English defines a pun or paronomasia as a kind of word play that presents words with multiple meanings. This is achieved through exploitation of similar-sou nd words or multiple meanings of words with an intention of creating either humor or some rhetoric effect. There is a strong relationship between puns and analytic cubism. Pablo and Georges harnessed the multiple meanings that can be brought about by joining various geometric shapes and combined the same with the various interpretations that can be drawn from monochromatic colors to come up with analytic cubism. For example, in Ambroise Vollard, Pablo used extremely dark colors unlike the contemporary bright colors to clearly bring out the lines and geometric shapes. Someone could have easily interpreted this for a color mix-up or an attempt to conceal certain elements of the portrait hence the multiple meanings as the case with puns. Similarly, he also used a brighter color on the forehead to bring out a folded and flattened head, a depiction that can never fade with time. Combined efforts by Pablo and Braque seemed like a real pun for the major reason that while Pablo, who had a g reat interest in Gauguins work and African masks, was busy exploring Czannes ideas, Braque on the other hand had a great interest in animations and thus celebrated contemplation. The fact that the two artists with diverse interests were working together thus seemed more or less an actual pun.A joke is defined as a certain statement that someone utters or something that one does whose major intention is o cause amusement and laughter. Jokes, therefore, are basically found everywhere regardless of the seriousness of the environment. How then can one be inspired by jokes to come up with analytical cubism? When Pablo Picasso painted the portrait of Ambroise Vollard in 1909, he dissembled a human figure and then reproduced it, through a painting, in a series of flat geometric plates that overlap and join each other at angles. What seemed like a joke in the entire portrait was the fact that a human face was reconstructed from cubes! Georges Braque on the other hand took the joke far when he tried analytic cubism in his village. He kept on reducing the architectural structure of his paintings into geometric forms that resemble cubes and then shaded the painting in a fragmented manner that it looked like both flat as well as three dimensional. The two examples given above illustrate that the two artists never had a concrete idea an mind but kept on experimenting in a what seemed like jokes to perfect on their artistic style. At the end of it, the entire artistic style, analytic cubism resembled a joke because there is no way a human painting can be divided into three dimensional jokes unless one is joking.Visual games are often interactive and contain static graphics generated through anime-style art or times video footages. According to Pablo Picasso, there is a lot of creativity in visual games and that is what interested him. The presentation of live characters I visual games is in itself an art. Hence, Pablo and Braque wanted to have a replica of visual games char acters but in still images and paintings. Drawing such characters on paper wouldnt bring out the creative aspect as intended by the two artistes and hence, they continuously experimented on how best to present the humor and creativity of such characters in still paintings. When coming up with analytic cubism, Pablo and Bra...